[We have amended our charter to change our name from "Potomac Institute" to "Potowmack Institute" to avoid confusion with numerous other entities that call themselves "Potomac" and "Institute" and "Potomac, Inc." in various forms. The e-mail address and URLs have changed to "potowmack.org".]
It's not about guns...
The Potowmack Institute
A 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation
4423 LeHigh Road, Suite 273
College Park, MD 20740
The Potowmack Institute receives no support from foundations or large contributors. This is still serious business. For concerned citizens who learn something here and want to help elevate public discourse, donations are tax deductible and can be sent payable to The Potowmack Institute,
4423 LeHigh Road, Suite 273, College Park, MD 20740
PayPal Paybox
[PotowmackForum], Interactive Posting
Second Amendment in Court, Index
Update April99:
Update September 1999:
The Second Amendment Foundation's amicus in Warin is provided at the
.../398safbr.html.)
or click PayPal Paybox below for credit card donation. The Potowmack Institute is very limited by the tax laws as to its lobbying activity. Concerned citizens who wish to form a 501(c)(4) membership organization for expanded political activity, please express an interest:
potowmack
then
@
then
potowmack.org.
leave out then's and spaces.
The e-mail address is presented this way to defeat the spam miscreants
[BOTTOM]
[HOMEPAGE].
[NRA v. Reno (July, 2000)]
[US v. Emerson PAGE]
[Printz and Mack PAGE]
[US v. Lopez PAGE]
[ARCHIVE]. Potowmack
Institute Files
[RESOURCES].
Newspaper, magazine, journal articles, books, links
http://www.potowmack/warin.html
Emerson, Hale, Wright, Nelson, City of Renton, Eckert, Rabbitt, Pencak, Miller, Oakes
United States v. Francis J. Warin
(The Warin case is not mentioned by Halbrook in his discussion
of court cases in That Every Man Be Armed. Gun lobby
literature contains frequent statements that the Supreme Court
has to take up the Second Amendment eventually and settle the
issue of gun rights. The only way the Supreme Court would
review this case is if a US Court of Appeals in another circuit
made a contrary ruling. To overturn these rulings the Supreme
Court would not only have to overturn all precedent but also
violate reason itself. The Second Amendment Foundation's
amicus curiae brief in this case contains the
statement: "What Amicus asserts is a basic right of free men to
take arms to defeat an oppressive government." It is not within
the powers of the judiciary to dissolve the government of the
United States and institute anarchy. The NRA does not go to
court on Second Amendment grounds. The inevitable repudiation
by the courts would end the discussion and the fantasy.
Update Sept98:
The repudiation is no longer certain with
Reagan/Bush libertarian fantasts on the court. For more on the
federal judiciary see Clarence Thomas
concurring opinion in Printz. A careful reading of the expressions of Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas does not support the kind of personal right the gun lobby/libertarians want against any and all government including state government. Scalia and Thomas, consistent with rightwing/libertarian ideology, object to the extention of central/federal authority into areas of state regulation. They don't seem to have a problem with the powers of the states to regulation. The issue then becomes what is the role of the Federal Government. The Potowmack Instutitute make a recommendation for
A National Firearms Policy
The federal district court in
US v. Emerson, March 30, 1999, embraced the gun lobby/libertarian pseudoscholarship to fabricate a "personal right" to be armed outside of any state or militia purpose. This case in under appeal to the
US Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. The docket can be followed at the Fifth Circuit website. The case no. is 99-10331.
The Potowmack Institute has filed an
amicus curiae brief in US v. Emerson which is a distillation of the arguments found in the Potowmack Institute files.
A National Firearms Policy
The Rule of Law
What does the NRA want?
Charlton Heston Speaks
What is at stake in Emerson is the relationship between citizen and state. It is as fundamental as the Constitution itself.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
Francis J. Warin,
Defendant-Appellant
Second Amendment Foundation,
Amicus Curiae.
No. 75-1734
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit
Argued Dec. 16, 1975. Decided Feb. 4, 1976.
Certiorari Denied June 21, 1976.See 96 S. Ct. 3168.
["Certiorari Denied" means the Supreme Court refused to hear the
appeal.]
[PotowmackForum], interactive posting